Readers: 57 | Updated: 07-19

NYT's Greenhouse: 'So-Called Partial-Birth Abortion' Ruling 'Patronizing' to Women

Translate Into:

Retiring New York Times Supreme Court reporter Linda Greenhouse has answered some more questions from readers at nytimes.com. After an earlier revelation that she considers the former ACLU lawyer Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg a centrist comes details of her deep affection for late ultra-liberal Justice William Brennan, whose decisions favored explicit racial quotas, no limits on abortion, mandatory school busing, opposition to the death penalty, and the strict separation of church and state:

Obviously, not every opinion Justice Brennan put his name to will stand the test of time. But many will. A personal note -- I took some time off from the court beat in the mid-1980's to have a baby and cover Congress for a couple of years. When I came back in 1988, Justice Brennan was 82 and the end of his tenure was in sight. He was one of the first people I ran into, in a court corridor. "I'm glad you're back," he said to me. I replied, "I'm glad you're still here."

By contrast, Greenhouse played it cooler when asked about the judicial philosophy of Justice Anthony Kennedy, who has become an unpredictable swing voter on a closely divided court. In Greenhouse's hothouse of ideology, Kennedy showed his big heart while supporting gay rights, but patronized women with his decision upholding the ban on partial-birth abortion:

I'm considerably less confident that I have a handle on Justice Kennedy's jurisprudence. Speaking personally, it's hard to reconcile his capacious understanding of the human condition in his majority opinion in Lawrence v. Texas, the 2003 gay rights case, with the patronizing and counter-factual attitude toward women that suffuses his majority opinion in Gonzales v. Carhart, last year's so-called partial-birth abortion case.

In April, the Court upheld the Federal Partial-Birth Abortion Act (not the "so-called" act) 5-4, with Kennedy writing the majority opinion. Greenhouse, who marched for abortion rights while covering the court for the Times in 1989, was clearly disheartened by the decision and appalled by Kennedy's sexism in her April 20 story:

But never until Wednesday had the court held that an abortion procedure could be prohibited because the procedure itself, not the pregnancy, threatened a woman's health -- mental health, in this case, and moral health as well. In his majority opinion, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy suggested that a pregnant woman who chooses abortion falls away from true womanhood.



From The Blogs

Electric Sheep Company

05-30
Note on IRS and Contractor Ruling
A few people took note when the U.S. Internal Revenue Service ruled earlier this month that a former contractor whom we had worked with as part of our Second Life greeters program should be classified... 查看全文

InfoWorld RSS Feed

06-05
Microsoft gets mixed ruling in latest Alcatel-Lucent case
Microsoft received a mixed ruling in the latest round of lawsuits between it and Alcatel-Lucent.This time, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California found that Microsoft did not ... 查看全文

Valleywag

06-06
Indiana Jones and the Fair-Use Ruling of Doom [Copyfight]
A guest post from commenter WagCurious: Lawrence Lessig and I have one thing in common: We both hate Yoko Ono.Not because she broke up the Beatles (debatable) but because she is the latest copyright o... 查看全文

Gawker

06-13
Tila Tequila Takes Credit For California's Gay Marriage Ruling [Disasters]
Tila Tequila, the diminutive star of MySpace and other useless things, ran her mouth to Us magazine recently (at the premiere of Mike Myers' The Love Guru, making this a truly star crossed occurrence)... 查看全文

The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan

06-13
Today's Ruling
Boumediene v Bush - Free Document Templates 查看全文

NewsBusters.org - Exposing Liberal Media Bias

06-13
Ruling a 'Big' & 'Stinging' Defeat, Could Prove 'Embarrassing' to Bush
The broadcast network evening newscasts gave as much emphasis Thursday night to the biting dissent as the majority opinion in the 5-4 Supreme Court ruling on behalf of the Guantanamo detainees, but to... 查看全文

NewsBusters.org - Exposing Liberal Media Bias

06-13
Levin on Reaction to Gitmo Ruling: Reporters Spewing Enemy Talking Points
In case you missed it, the Supreme Court Thursday bestowed Constitutional rights to terrorists currently held at Guantanamo Bay.As my colleague Brent Baker reported hours ago, the broadcast evening ne... 查看全文

The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com

06-14
Andy Worthington: The Supreme Court's Guantanamo ruling: what does it mean?
Those who cherish the United States' historical adherence to the rule of law -- myself included -- were delighted to hear that the US Supreme Court ruled on Thursday, in the case of Boumediene v. Bush... 查看全文

Crooks and Liars

06-15
McCain sees detainee ruling as one of the ‘worst’ in ‘the history of this country’
The Supreme Court ruled this week to extend access to the federal courts to detainees at Guantanamo Bay. When reporters asked John McCain for his reaction a few hours later, he struck a disappointed n... 查看全文

The Corner

06-16
A Way Forward After Last Week's Supreme Court Ruling on Enemy Combatants
While lots more gnashing of teeth is called for, I think it's extremely important that we push ahead with concrete, practical steps to prevent what could be disastrous fallout from the Supreme Court's... 查看全文
More Articles