译文:
To Chineses people - when would you be angry ?
Suffer from insomnia and I get up from my bed again, I read this following writing in Deng Weibiao's blog.
The bank have no responsibility for the fake money out from ATM.
Depositors take responsibility for the theft of international bank.
Less money from a broken-down ATM, depositors take charge of it.
More money from a broken-down ATM, depositors are condemned to life imprisonment for theft.
More money from the bank, depositors are in duty bound to return.
Less money to depositors, the bank do not take reponsiblility for it after leaving counters.
The branch president of Guangdong Kaiping Bank was condemned to 12-years-prison for defalcating 400 millions.
Common people was condemned to life imprisonment for taking out 170 thousands more from ATM.
Here I change a little of his title (the original one is <To Chinese people, why don't you be angry?>), and i'd like to complain as exercise.
It regards to the "endure" in Chinese tradition of Deng Weibiao's "complaining" in his article. It presumedly means that most of people are not afraid of dead and the rest part who are afraid of begins to endure.
Just keeping the point of endure aside, i notice another aspect of this problem.
Why the government shirked reponsibility of the bank completely? Defalcating 400 millions is serious enough to consititude the crime of corruption, but a criminal act that is maximum counted of theft for taking 170 thousands without robbing should not to condemned to life imprisonment.People were used to pay homage to state units and also neglect the right of being a taxpayer, it is probably a historical problems of transformation period turn from planned economy to market economy.
Actually we pay tax of clothing, food, shelter and transportation, in aspects of our life, which paid to offical.
Why should we pay homage to those who are econimic supported of us?
The < Analects of confucius> records, Yao said in his old age when passing throne to Shun:"The heaven-determined order of success now rests in your body, sincerely hold the fast due mean." Shun also said that when he passing throne to Yu. In fact the keystone of this statement is not the throne but obviously the signification of "sincerly hold the fast due mean."
The confucius culture stresses ideal state of harmony between nature and human, deeply means everything returns to the nature in the end. The nature here refers to the heaven. And the "mean" in "sincerely hold the fast due mean" really means impartial, as the golden mean that the Confuciansm advocate. Move towards today it could be annotated to harmony.
However, it cannot be harmony if little things are appropriate and sufficient, can it? The answer is certainly no.
If you believe in Fengshui, you should go to visit and sum up the law of houses that which host and hostess were in early death, it leads to the conclusion about aspects of Fengshui.
Fengshui is validated by Zhouyi with combination of past experiences, surely may not be usually exact but occasionally shows marvelous accuracy.
Extremes meet, as the proverb contains the similar truth. Supposed you didn't rectify the continuously accumulated status quo while expanding another one, it must be harming the first side. For example the poor man who is in a dead-end poverty has to find ways when cannot go the life on any more, thus come out the proverb " Flexible men may sussceed; active trees can die." For another, the rich man who is in a heavy pause goes on expand his wealth as always, it must breaks the balance in a certain area by the maladjustment of wealth distribution. So who will be made suffer for it except him?
The truth is applicable to the large as a country, small as private groups. Nothing will be affirmative that goes the own way of persistence in law violation.
For instance, the bank harmed someone in the name of unit, however, surely the work must be operated by someone. Thus it! I never heard that no one is unhappy who works in the bank, you may not have peaceful eating and sleeping and sufferd from something return. Omnipresence is justice.
In the upper ten most people thought disadvantageous groups bashing a normal thing. But life is unique and equal to anyone, nomatter a rich one or a poor. There is no need to trample on others.
What i would like to say is, the law is not to be oversteped but complied, and absolutely not restricting the whole aspects of men's behavioural norms. If it is, then the rich people can murder and set fire unscrupulously because they have ways to weasel out of criminal activities. Another example, the people such as Theissen,Jet Li and a special policeman are supposed to have ability to give lessons to their foes, but why do they dare to do? Could it be said that they are afraid of the law?
Surely not.
In many cases, the restriction of human's behavioural norms is custom or tradition.
In moral, tradition is equal to the law. There will be once and again curses on you if you go against the law, continued for a long time, how could a person have peaceful sleep who is on pins and weedles. It is the derivation of the proverb:" A good conscience is a soft pillow." Without bragging, do not said that in the middle night even during the day, heard someone calling your name made you shiver when you often did bashing or detriment. By a period of time your longevity will also be curtailed.
Therefore, it is traditon that Chinese people do not be angry. However, the aftereffect will be extremely serious when Chinese people get angry.
Look at the war of resist America and aid Korea and the Sino-India border war of self-defence, that shows the "puny" Chinese won "powerful" American soilders by our own power. We'd better not to make the complextion of internal and external problems out and contain internal harmony at least. Internal disharmony brings many inside problem, we'd better not to fight our own and internal dissensions cannot flare up. As no one can bear with the topical curses by eyes that is watching your life.
In a word, be more magnanimous! Nothing would be born with you as well as die with you, why treat things as death or glory contests?