增强自身技能:企业思考视角全球化

读者: 1191    发布时间: 2008

原文: Sharpening Your Skills: Thinking About Global

Published: May 27, 2008

Sharpening Your Skills dives into the HBS Working Knowledge archives to bring together articles on ways to improve your business skills.

Questions to be Answered

  • Are global brands effective?
  • How should I think about strategy in a flat world?
  • Which countries are the most business friendly?
  • How can my foreign assests and resources be protected?

Are global brands effective?

Why Global Brands Work
Japanese automakers create single products and brands for worldwide consumption, while Ford customizes products for local markets. You know who won. Why do global brands work? What makes them work? Professor John Quelch provides some answers.

Key concepts include:

  • For decades, Ford has created specialized products for different countries while Toyota, Nissan, and Honda sold standard products under a single brand umbrella.
  • Ford's strategy resulted in added manufacturing and supply chain costs, a balkanized bureaucracy, and deteriorating market share, financial performance, and stock price.
  • There are five characteristics that all top global brands have in common.

How should I think about strategy in a (not so) flat world?

Businesses Beware: The World Is Not Flat
With apologies to Thomas Friedman, managers who believe the hype of a flat world do so at their own risk, says HBS professor Pankaj Ghemawat. National borders still matter a lot for business strategists. While identifying similarities from one place to the next is essential, effective cross-border strategies will take careful stock of differences as well.

Key concepts include:

  • Some indicators of globalization aren't increasing as many experts have claimed.
  • Toyota and Wal-Mart are examples of companies that understand how to deal with distance in a strategic way.
  • Take a broad view of differences, figure out the ones that matter the most in your industry, and look at them not just as difficulties to be overcome but also as potential sources of value creation.

Which countries are the most business friendly?

Handicapping the Best Countries for Business
India? South Africa? Russia? Which are the best countries for a firm to invest in? Although circumstances in some countries have changed since this 2007 interview, Professor Richard Vietor's basic advice for analyzing the business environment of countries remains strong.

Key concepts include:

  • Governments create the overall environment for successful competition in the global economy. Bad government can only lead to less competitive businesses.
  • To be competitive, countries need to offer businesses sound fiscal and monetary policies, secure property rights, high savings and investment, an absence of corruption, and exports that are competitive in enough areas to eventually balance imports.
  • Business people must understand where markets and countries are headed by analyzing the present and then extending current performance trends forward three to five years.
  • Although each has issues, Singapore, China, and India are currently the best bets for FDI and, pending political stability.

How can my foreign assests and resources be protected?

Risky Business? Protecting Foreign Investments
After a string of forced nationalizations of private enterprises in the 1960s and 1970s, the pendulum swung back and companies were again encouraged by host countries to build and run major infrastructure projects such as power and water. But a set of new property protections has done little to manage the risk in many of these politically unstable environments. Professor Louis T. Wells, coauthor of a recent book on making foreign investment safe, discusses the current landscape.

Key concepts include:

  • Although property rights protections for investors in developing nations have improved since 1980, the new instruments are failing to satisfy the interests of either host countries or their business partners.
  • Protections can be improved by developing a real consensus on the part of investors' home countries, host countries, and investors themselves.
  • Business managers must take a significant role in pushing for a multilateral agreement on foreign direct investment, or at least become active in promoting lesser changes that will lead to more balance and security in the current system. Otherwise businesses will lose profitable opportunities and find themselves in the middle of disputes that hurt their future prospects. And poor countries will fail to benefit from what investors can bring them.
  • Absent strong protections, managers must ask themselves a series of questions before investing in developing countries, such as: Is my investment project politically sensitive? If so, will the country continue to need my participation in the project? 

译文: 增强自身技能:企业思考视角全球化

2008年5月27日发表

      《增强自身技能》是在钻研哈佛商学院的网络周刊,搜索关于改进商业技能的大量文章后写成的。

文章中将要回答的问题:

·   国际品牌是否有效?

·   在平面的世界环境中我如何考虑战略问题?

·   哪些国家是在商业上最友好的?

·   如何保护我的国外资产和资源?

国际品牌是否有效?

国际品牌为什么起作用

      日本汽车制造商创立了为全球消费者服务的单一系列的产品和品牌,而福特为局部市场定制产品。你知道谁赢了。为什么国际品牌起作用?是什么是它们起作用?约翰·魁尔奇教授提供了一些答案。

      主要观点包括:

·   几十年来,福特已经为不同国家制造了许多专门产品,而丰田、尼桑和本田只销售在一个品牌保护下的标准产品。

·   福特的战略导致生产成本和供应连成本的增加、官僚格局、市场占有率下降、财政运作和股票价格恶化。

在平面(不是那样平面)的世界环境中我如何考虑战略问题

企业应当注意:世界不是平面的

      带着对托马斯·弗里德曼的歉意,哈佛商学院教授潘卡·凯玛瓦特说,相信平面世界的管理者们会自担风险擅自行动。国界对于企业战略专家仍然影响很大。虽然确定从一个地区到另一个地区的相似点是关键的,但是有效的跨国战略最好还是认真观察地区之间的不同点。

      主要观点包括:

·   正如许多专家所称,全球化的一些指标不再增加

·   丰田和沃尔马是理解如何从战略角度处理距离问题的公司范例

·   从广泛的视角看不同,在你的经营业务中确定对你影响最大的不同点,并且不仅把这些不同点作为一种需要克服的困难,而且要看作创造价值的潜在源泉。

哪些国家是在商业上最友好的?

在最好的国家做生意变得不利

      印度?南非?俄罗斯?哪个是适合投资的最好国家?尽管自从这次2007访谈以来一些国家的投资环境已经转变,但是查理德教授对国家商业环境分析的基本建议仍然影响很大。

      主要观点包括:

·   在国际经济中,政府创造促进良性竞争的大环境,不健全的政府只能导致商业竞争缺乏。

·   为了有效竞争政府需要为企业提供健全的财政政策和货币政策、财产权保护、高储蓄和高投资,杜绝腐败,通过充分竞争的出口来最终实现进出口平衡。

·   企业经营者必须通过分析现在的执行情况和推进三到五年后的执行情况,来考虑应该向哪个国家、哪个市场投资。

·   虽然各有政策,但是新加坡、中国和印度是目前国际直接投资最佳选择,同时这些国家的政治比较稳定。

如何保护我的国外资产和资源?

企业冒险?保护国外投资

      经过20世纪60年代和70年代,一系列的私有企业国有化,局势回转,许多公司再次被东道国鼓励去建造和运作大型的基础设施项目,例如能源和电力。但是一套新的财产保护措施在许多政治因素不稳定的环境中,对减少投资企业的风险基本上不起作用。路易斯教授是一本最近的关于使国外投资更安全的书的合著者分析了当前的形势。

      主要观点包括:

·   尽管投资者在发展中国家的财产权保护自1980年以来得到了改善,但是新手段无法让东道国或者合作商的利益得到满足。

·   投资商所在国、东道国和投资商自身达成真正的一致后,财产保护才能得以改善。

·   企业管理者必须在推进对外投资的多边协定中担当重要角色,或者至少在现有的框架下促使少许改变,以促进更加平衡和安全。否则,企业丧失赢利的机会并且陷入毁坏自身未来前景的境地。同时,不健全的国家将不能得到投资者给予他们的利处。

·   如果缺乏有力的保护,在向发展中国家投资之前管理者必须问自己一系列的问题。例如,我的投资项目在政治上是否敏感?如果是那样,该国是否还需要我在该项目上的参与。