优秀的客户服务需要付出代价,你愿意吗?

读者: 3652    发布时间: 2007

原文: Client Service as a Competitive Advantage

Excellent customer service demands a price. Are you willing to pay it?

As someone who has been heavily involved facilitating strategic planning processes with organizations during the last 15+ years, I often find it somewhat amusing how people answer the questions I pose.

For example, if I ask people, "What is your unique differentiation in the marketplace?" or "What does your organization really excel at?" They will almost always reply, "It has to be our client service." Almost no one will admit to being "lousy" in client service, any more than they will talk about living in an average town with average kids. Instead I see the "Lake Woebegone Syndrome." In Lake Woebegone it seems all the women are pretty, all the men are handsome, and all the kids are well above average.

If while getting to know someone's agency or company, I ask the question, "If I hauled you into a court of law and accused you of being a 'world
class' client service provider, would there be enough evidence to convict you?" Many times, unfortunately, their answer is, "Probably not."

Therefore, if so many people think client service and satisfaction is so critical to the success of the vision and the execution of the strategic plan,
why is it not usually monitored with the same intensity as the financials? After all, financials are a lagging indicator (telling what happened after the
fact) while client satisfaction may be a leading indicator (it can be predicting what may happen in the future).

Many organizations go through all sorts of trial and error and purchase various software programs to keep their finger on the pulse of dollars and
cents because they want to know where they are and minimize opportunity for loss. For years it has been known that "what gets measured gets
done."

If that is the case, why is it that many organizations choose to almost ignore measuring client satisfaction? By doing so, they run the risk of losing
established clients to the competition.

Client Service as Overarching Philosophy

In 1960, Professor Theodore Leavitt wrote the groundbreaking article, "Marketing Myopia," in the Harvard Business Review. To paraphrase, he basically concluded that the purpose of all business is to attract and maintain customers while generating adequate profitability today and improved profitability in the future. That balancing act still holds true today. How many organizations do you know that are masters at bringing business in the front door only to lose it out the back door just as quickly? We have also dealt with organizations that service their existing business so well that the owners and principals "never get around to developing new business."

Those organizations and agencies that see customer or client service as simply a department to be managed rather than a point of strategic
differentiation may be looking at the business through the lens of short-term focus. So many people that we talk with have never calculated the
lifetime value of a typical insured and even those that have usually aren't communicating that number to their staff at every level of the organization
on a regular basis. Knowing that number can provide a framework to make decisions for the long haul and maintain the client relationship rather
than looking at it from a "transactional" basis.

To calculate the lifetime value, take the number of years that a client/insured usually stays with the agency multiplied by the estimated net profit
per line of business (auto, P&C, E&O, DB, etc). The total dollars can give you some idea of what is at risk in the future if you under serve your
client base.

For example, if a typical insured stays with your agency 15 years and has 3 different policies with you each generating $200/year in profit, each
new insured is worth approximately $9000 going forward (15yrs x $200/policy x 3 policies = $9000) if they are treated so well that they won't even consider moving to someone else. Now ask yourself, how cavalierly would you treat a check written to your agency for $9000? Would you do the
equivalent of going into your back yard, digging a hole, burying it there and walking away from it forever? In essence that is what happens when
clients are taken for granted. The cause can either be by default i.e. not paying attention, understaffing by design, allowing a lack of systemic
follow-up and follow-through, or it can be attributed to a management team with so strong a focus on short-term results that they become almost
greedy. Does your organization have a client service strategy? If you examine your strategic plan, it's necessary to differentiate the agency
strategy and plan from the client service strategy. They are not identical. Organizations need to implement a "Client Bill of Rights."

Leaders in organizations need to ask themselves if they are willing to pay the price for excellent client service vs. good client service. Excellence
costs, but it also pays off. Being even a little better than the competitor pays huge dividends. Yet many organizations are not willing to pay that
price. Instead they are content with processes, technology and staff who are "good enough."

As mentioned before, "what gets measured gets done." Client expectation measurements are important, as are ways to monitor them. It is
necessary for organizations to take the time to discover why a client has signed on with you and not the competition. It's also necessary to
determine what they really want to have happen as part of the client experience. It is then up to you to make sure you are delivering what your
client wants. Failure to do so most likely will result in the loss of that client to your competitor.

Once you determine what it is your client really desires, make sure you match those expectations in terms of pricing and service. Make sure you
are not trying to sell a champagne policy to someone with a beer budget and vice versa. It's necessary to have processes in place to support
excellent client service from beginning to end. That is, do you have the right amount of staffing resources to meet their needs? Make it as easy as
possible for them to conduct business with you.

While having the proper talent is vital to ensuring excellence in client service, it is also known that 94% of failings are the result of process/system
failures and not people failures.

My car recently broke down. While it was being towed to the dealer, the towing company damaged another part of the car. The dealer was willing
to go ahead and fix the damage, but the towing company wanted the damage they caused handled by their insurance carrier. They had a local
agent connected to an insurance company in Arizona. The problem was that the local agent did not have the necessary claim number or phone
number for the agent handling the claim in Arizona. Therefore, the dealer, who was willing and able to fix the car, didn't have the information they
needed to work with the towing company. As a result, repairs that could have been completed in 48 hours took four to six weeks.

The problem was that no one owned the entire client experience; each company only owned a piece of it. Anytime there is an opportunity for a
hand-off where something can go wrong, organizations often rely on the client, who has no knowledge of the situation, to be able to handle the
details. It is vital for organizations to own the entire client experience.

Of course, no matter what the situation is, things don't always go smoothly. Problems arise, that's why organizations should make sure they have
a process in place for "service recovery." That is, if something goes wrong suddenly, they should be able to recover with minimal damage.

Finally, organizations should make sure their policies protect the right people. Often, they have policies in place that protect themselves against
the 1% of clients who abuse the system. This makes the other 99% of their clients who play by the rules pay the price. Many organizations,
unfortunately, don't look at what they are doing through the eyes of the customers. Rather, they only are looking to protect themselves.

Excellent customer service demands a price. Are you willing to pay it?

About the Author

Doug Brown is the CEO and Chairman of Paradigm Associates LLC, a strategic and executive leadership development firm based in Cranford,
NJ. He combines an innovative thinking style with his conversational questioning ability to help organizations recognize and breakthrough their
existing paradigms. This naturally leads them to solve stubborn problems and work through difficult situations. A Certified Facilitator for the Total
Quality Institute (TQI), Brown understands the distinction between simply conducting "training sessions" and facilitating meetings with potentially
complex subject matter. Visit www.ParadigmAssociates.US or call (908) 276-4547.

译文: 优秀的客户服务需要付出代价,你愿意吗?

优秀的客户服务需要付出代价,你愿意吗?
     在过去的15年里,我一直深入参与推进组织的战略计划,我经常发现人们对我的问题的回答很有意思。例如,如果我问他们:“你在市场上的独一无二之处是?”或者:“你的组织真正做的好的是什么?”他们总是回答,“是我们的客户服务。”。几乎没有人承认自己在客户服务方面做的差,说的好象家常便饭一样容易。然而,我看到了“沃比根湖综合症”。所有的女人都被湖水映得美丽,男人变的英俊,就连孩子也看上去比一般的聪明。

     如果认识某个机构或者公司,我问这个问题:”如果我把你拖入一个官司,控告你是一个世界级的客户服务提供者,我能找到足够的证据吗?”.很不幸,尽管问了很多次,他们的回答是:”可能没有”因此,既然大家都认为客户服务和客户满意度是战略计划成功的关键,为什么不保持像对财务状况一样的监控强度呢?毕竟,财务状况是是一个滞后的(事后的)的监视器,然而客户满意度可能是一个主要的指示器(它能够预示将来会发生什么)
     许多组织想方设法购买各种软件程序来好让自己可以掌握汇率变动状态,他们想知道赚了多少钱并且想把损失的机率降到最低.“只有能被衡量的,才能够被执行.”这句话已经风行多年了.如果真是这样,为什么许多组织忽视客户满意度的掌握呢?这样做,是冒着把客户送给竞争对手的风险的!
 
客户服务是核心理念

     1960年,德莱赛教授在哈佛商业评论上发表了一本奠基性的文章:”市场的近视”,他推演出商业的目的,无论是现在还是将来,是在吸引和维护顾客的同时获取足够的利润,.这种平衡性的行为直到今天仍然如此.你知道有多少组织是擅长从前门得到生意马上在后门丢了的啊?我们也遇到那样的组织,把现有的生意打理的很好以致他们的老板从不考虑发展新的生意。这些组织和机构仅仅把客户服务看作一个部门而不是一个战略点.通过短期关注的焦点可以看到生意的差别.

     我们交谈过的很多人没有计算一份投保的全部价值,他们没有定期把这个数字告诉各个阶层的员工.知道这个数字能够为长远的决策提供一个框架并且维持客户关系而不仅仅是从交易的基础上看问题.

     为了计算终身价值,把客户投保的年数乘以每宗生意的预估净利润(宝洁, E&O, DB等等).总数能够让你了解一下如果客户服务不好的话未来有多大的风险.例如,如果一个典型的投保是15年,有三份保单,每份产生200元每年的利润,每个新的投保价值大概9000元(15年*200元/份*3份=9000元)如果客户被服务得很好的话就不会转投其他人.现在问你自己,你将如何对待客户给你的9000元?你将给予同等的服务吗?还是走到后院挖个洞把钱埋在里面然后一走了之,把一切视作理所当然?你默认设计上的人员不足,允许缺乏系统上的跟进,或许这可以归因于管理团队短视以致他们变得几乎贪婪的结果.你的组织有一个客户服务策略么?

      如果你检查你的战略计划,需要把机构战略和客户服务战略区分开来。它们是不相同的。组织需要实施的"客户人权法案。 "组织的领导人需要问他们自己是否真的愿意为优秀的客户服务付出代价.优秀是要付出代价的,但是它会有回报.只比对手出色一丁点就有巨大的红利.然而许多组织不愿意付出这样的代价.反而,他们满足于过程,技术,还有”优秀的”的员工。就像前面提到过的,“只有能被衡量的,才能够被执行.”客户期望的测量是重要的,我们以此来跟踪他们的需求.组织需要花时间去发掘为什么一个客户与你而不是和竞争对手签约.也就是需要确定他们真正想要的.如果不能这样做,就很有可能把客户推到竞争对手那里去。
     一旦你确定你的客户真正想要的,你就要确定这些期望是与定价和服务相匹配的。你要确定你不会试图卖香槟给一个只买得起啤酒的,反之亦然.你还必须有流程到位来支持从始至终的优秀客户服务.这也就是说,你是否有足够的人力资源来满足他们的要求?使他们尽可能容易地与你做生意.拥有合适的人才对于确保卓越的客户服务是至关重要的,当然人们还知道94%的错误都是程序/系统犯的与人无关.

     最近,我的车坏了。在拖往经销商的路上,拖运公司又把车的另一部分弄坏了。经销商愿意修复损伤,但是拖运公司却想让他们的运输保险商来处理他们损坏的部分。这家亚里桑那的保险公司在本地有个代理,但问题的本地代理没有必备的投诉或者联系电话号码。因此,愿意维修的经销商没有与拖运公司展开合作的必需信息,结果48个小时内可以完成的事情却花了四到六个星期。

     问题是每个公司都只有部分的,而不是完全的的客户服务经历。任何时候只要是什么地方出错了,组织经常依赖客户来具体处理,而客户根本不了解情况。拥有完整的客户服务经历对组织来说至关重要。当然,无论怎样,事情不可能一帆风顺。这就是为什么当问题出现后组织应该确认他们有到位的程序来做“补救服务”。这也就是说,如果突然出问题了,他们应该能够把损失补救到最小。

     最后,组织应该确保他们的政策能够保护好人。他们的政策经常是让自己能否应付1%的破坏规则的顾客,而让其它99%遵守规则的顾客付出代价。不幸的是,很多组织不是通过顾客的眼睛去看问题。他们仅仅是考虑保护自己。

       优秀的客户服务需要付出代价,你愿意么?

作者介绍:
 
道格。布朗先生是管理范式联营有限责任公司的主席和首席执行官,这是一家战略和行政领导力开发公司,总部位于新泽西的克兰福德. 他结合了创新的思想作风与交谈式的提问能力,以帮助组织认识和突破,其现有的范式。这自然会帮助他们解决管理顽症和度过难关。他是全面质量研究所的认证咨询师,布郎知道”培训班”和有潜在的复杂课题的促进会议之间的差别.欲知详情,请访问www.ParadigmAssociates.US或者打电话(908) 276-4547.