为竞标制造更大加油机,波音公司还需六个月

读者: 737    发布时间: 2008

原文: Boeing Seeks 6 More Months for Tanker Bid With Larger Plane - Bloomberg

Boeing Seeks Time for Tanker Bid With Larger Plane (Update4)

By Gopal Ratnam and Susanna Ray

Aug. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Boeing Co. says the aerial tanker it proposed for a $35 billion Pentagon program is no longer a good match because the Air Force is now emphasizing fuel capacity and it deserves six months more to challenge Northrop Grumman Corp.'s larger plane.

``What we proposed 18 months ago would not fit the bill for what the Air Force is looking for,'' Boeing spokesman Daniel Beck said in an interview of the company's 767-200 aircraft. ``We've been looking at other configurations'' because of the Air Force focus on fuel capacity. Boeing may quit the contest without more time to prepare a bid based on a bigger plane, he said.

The request may leave U.S. military officials facing the prospect of a longer wait to replace a fleet of aging tankers, or possibly leaving Northrop as the sole bidder on the program. Giving Chicago-based Boeing extra time would also push the decision on the contract into next year and a new U.S. presidential administration, creating additional obstacles.

``I get a feeling that they are perhaps playing delay tactics,'' Michel Merluzeau, an aviation consultant at G2 Solutions in Kirkland, Washington, said in an interview. ``They could probably get even more time if, say, the Democrats win'' the election in November and take office in January.

In the last round of the competition, which Los Angeles- based Northrop won in February, both companies got about ``seven to eight months'' to submit bids after the Pentagon announced a draft proposal, Beck said.

Second Competition

The Government Accountability Office decided on June 19 to uphold Boeing's protest. The GAO said the Air Force made ``significant errors'' in awarding the contract to Northrop and partner European Aeronautic, Defence & Space Co., the parent of Boeing rival Airbus SAS.

The Pentagon agreed to reopen bidding on eight issues raised by the GAO, and released a draft proposal on Aug. 6 that, among other things, specified there would be an advantage for a larger fuel payload. The department has said it will issue a final bid request next week and hopes to have a decision by year-end.

The Defense Department wants to move ahead ``in an expeditious fashion'' and still plans to issue the final request for bids next week, along with a deadline, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman told reporters today. ``Whether either of the contractors submits a proposal is entirely up to them.''

Any delay in issuing the final rules will be ``harmful to the warfighter'' and lead to a ``direct escalation in cost to the government,'' Northrop spokesman Randy Belote said in an e-mail.

Boeing Allies

Boeing and its allies say that's not enough time to produce a bid with a bigger aircraft.

The Pentagon's desire for a larger tanker ``poses substantial costs to taxpayers,'' Senator Sam Brownback, a Kansas Republican, said in a statement. If the department's new bid request favors higher fuel capacity, ``it must provide adequate time for competitors to offer bids.''

Boeing's request is ``reasonable and it should be granted,'' George Behan, a spokesman for Representative Norm Dicks, a Washington Democrat, said in an e-mail. Dicks is a Boeing supporter and a senior member of House Appropriations Committee that approves military spending. Boeing's allies in Congress have said awarding the contract to the team of Northrop and Toulouse, France-based Airbus team may cost U.S. jobs.

Comparing Tankers

Boeing, which has supplied Air Force refueling tankers for more than a half-century, based its bid on a modified 767 commercial plane. The Northrop-EADS entry was based on the Airbus A330 commercial jetliner. The Northrop aircraft can carry 250,000 pounds of fuel, more than Boeing's 205,000.

The next biggest plane in Boeing's commercial lineup is the 777, which is bigger than the A330.

In 2004, a Boeing contract with the Air Force to lease replacement tankers was scrapped because of ethical violations that sent a Boeing executive and a Pentagon official to jail. The scandal led to a new competition that opened the door to Northrop and Airbus.

Boeing rose $2, or 3.2 percent, to $65.55 at 4:15 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange tradingm, while Northrop increased 61 cents to $70.

To contact the reporters on this story: Gopal Ratnam in Washington at http://news.google.com/news/mailto:gratnam1@bloomberg.net; Susanna Ray in Seattle at http://news.google.com/news/mailto:sray7@bloomberg.net

译文: 为竞标制造更大加油机,波音公司还需六个月

      8月22日(彭博社),Gopal Ratnam和Susanna Ray报道-波音公司称其为五角大楼提供的价值350亿美元空中加油机的项目进展并不顺利,因为美国空军越来越看重加油机的运油量,而诺思罗普.格鲁门公司的大飞机刚好适合美国空军这一需求,要想打败竞争对手,波音公司还需要六个月时间。

      波音公司发言人DanielBeck在一次采访中说:“波音公司18个月前提出的波音767-200型飞机的供应方案不符合美国空军的要求,我们一直在设计一种更合适的机型,因为美国空军的侧重点是运油量。公司需要六个月时间来研究并设计出一种新型的飞机,以投标承包美国空军飞机供应项目。”

      波音公司延时交付的诉求将会使美国军方面临双重选择:要么等待更长的时间更新空中加油机机队,要么指定诺思罗普.格鲁门公司作为此项目的唯一供应商。如果答应波音公司的请求,那么就要等到明年才能签订合同,到那时,美国总统又换了新的人选,说不定又会有多少新麻烦呢。

      华盛顿科克兰的G2 Solutions公司航空事务顾问米歇尔.梅鲁周在一次采访中说:“我觉得波音公司其实是在拖延时间,比方说,如果民主党在十一月份的大选中获胜并在一月入主白宫,他们就会争取到更多时间。”

      Beck说:“如果不能延缓时间,那么总部坐落于芝加哥的波音公司就将退出竞标。上一次,在五角大楼公布招标公告之后,两家公司都有七八个月的时间准备投标,但最后却是诺思罗普.格鲁门公司胜出。”

        五角大楼发言人帕特里克.里德说,军方高层未对此事发表任何评论。

      第二轮竞标

      政府问责局于6月19日声明支持波音公司,认为美国空军“犯了一个大错误”,它不该和诺思罗普.格鲁门公司及它的合作伙伴欧洲航空防务及航天公司(波音公司竞争对手空客的母公司)签订购机合同。

      五角大楼同意政府问责局提出的八个问题,决定重新招标并于8月6日提出设计方案,指定飞机的燃料有效载荷量必须加大。招商部门将于下周发布最终方案并给竞标者45天的时间做准备。但是波音公司认为,要想制造出一架更大的飞机,45天根本不够。

       围绕着波音公司西雅图地区的生产基地,华盛顿一位民主党议员Norm Dicks的发言人George Behan在一封电子邮件中说:“波音公司的请求是‘合理的并且应当受到嘉奖的’波音公司在国会中的盟友强调,将订单给了诺思罗普.格鲁门公司和图卢兹(空中客车在法国的基地)将使美国损失很多就业机会。

      半个世纪

      半个多世纪以来,波音公司一直为美国空军提供加油机,此次通过改进767型商用飞机的方式参与竞标。诺思罗普.格鲁门公司和欧洲航空防务及航天公司以空客A330商用喷气式飞机参与竞标。后者可以承载250,000英镑的燃油,而前者只能承载205,000英镑。

      波音公司另一个适合的飞机是777系列,是世界上最大的商用飞机,比空客330还要大。

      2004年,因为违背了商业道德,波音公司和美国空军关于租借加油机的合同终止,波音的一名高管和五角大楼的一名高官也被送进了监狱。这一丑闻为诺思罗普.格鲁门公司和空客打开了一扇大门,波音将不得不面对竞争。

      根据纽约股票交易所披露的信息,昨天波音公司的股票价格上涨了34美分,达到63.55美元,诺思罗普.格鲁门公司的股票价格下降了1美分,达到69.39美元。